Overview of Oncology Companion diagnostic (CDx) biomarker education resources 

The era of companion diagnostics started with the very first targeted therapy when it was found that Tamoxifen was effective for breast cancer patients overexpressing the Estrogen Receptor. This first biomarker ER gave rise to a revolution in staining techniques that resulted in the highly automated IHC staining methods for formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue biopsies we use today.  

Tamoxifen - First biomarker based targeted therapy

The IHC + targeted therapy model was successfully repeated for a wave of targeted therapies that are now used for treating cancer patients. To name the most well-known biomarker therapy combinations ER/PR – hormone therapy in breast cancer, HER2 –  anti HER2 antibody therapies; PD-L1 immune therapy. The evolution of IHC technology enabled the wide adoption of CDx testing that is both reliable, accessible and fast. 

Immunohistochemistry technology revolution

Different to simple molecular testing IHC CDx tests require interpretation by a pathologist following a scoring system. These interpretation scoring systems complement the IHC CDx biomarker test and are crucial to make the right therapy selection for the patient. Mistakes in therapy selection can cause direct harm to the patients if they miss out on their most optimal therapy due to a misinterpretation in the scoring and also has a direct societal cost if precious healthcare budget is spent on wrongly prescribed targeted therapies. 

In my 30-year experience with CDx biomarkers I have learned that the education of pathologists on biomarkers is often overlooked or if available not fit for purpose. The first reason this is important is to provide training on how to use the biomarker in routine practice so they can reliably report a correct result to their oncologists. The second reason is to make sure that new therapies can reach all of the patient population that will benefit in the shortest possible time frame. Simply put without a trained pathologist a hospital cannot perform the test and complex send out schemes need to be organized which take time to set up. If it takes 3 years for all of the pathologists to perform the CDx test, during that 3-year period a significant number of patients will miss out on their therapy. Generally these will be patients that are less fortunate and do not have the means to travel to an expert center confirming the observation that low socio-economic status may reduce access to testing and that this has important implications for slow uptake of drug prescription.  

The pharmaceutical industry has a key role in providing medical education regarding their therapies and companion diagnostic testing since they have all the data including biomarker stained slides generated during clinical trials and can start building diagnostic resources well in advance to drug launches. Professional societies and academic initiatives are slower to generate data and typically lack the resources required to launch global training initiatives. 

What matters to pathologists is that the educational resources include access to biomarker stained slides, since the advent of digital pathology it is possible to offer a hands on digital microscope experience and interact with these images via a standard web browser. This has led to a number of e-learning initiatives to support improving biomarker scoring skills.  

I wanted to generate a structured, curated list of oncology companion diagnostic biomarker educational resources with digital pathology images to facilitate those looking for more information. This list is not exhaustive but includes all the most relevant resources and a few examples that I personally believe to be very well made. These are my top 11 favorite resources:   

Conclusions 

The most advanced CDx education tools combine IHC scoring guidance with a whole slide image atlas and self assessments. More advanced topics like common artifacts, how to deal with borderline cases, expected staining results and controls are best handled in live trainings where participants interact in a virtual multi head microscope setting.  

Pathomation has proudly contributed to many of the examples above. Building on our 14 years of expertise in the domain our best practice advice is to provide a combination of a publicly accessible knowledge resource complemented with an on-demand training program for pathologists. 

New on the horizon is AI assisted learning. Our own experience with integration AI biomarker interpretation in e-learning shows participant engagement and learning progress strongly benefit. The technical challenges to provide such a learning experience are not to be ignored, if users experience delays or have to learn how to use a complicated interface the first encounter with AI algorithms will be disappointing. We all agree first impressions matter.  

Learn more about the Pathomation PathoTrainer program: PathoTrainer | The Platform for Biomarker Training, Scoring and CDx Validation. — Pathomation 

References 

Norris, R.P., Dew, R., Sharp, L. et al. Are there socio-economic inequalities in utilization of predictive biomarker tests and biological and precision therapies for cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med18, 282 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01753-0 

Li S, He Y, Liu J, Chen K, Yang Y, Tao K, Yang J, Luo K, Ma X. An umbrella review of socioeconomic status and cancer. Nat Commun. 2024 Nov 18;15(1):9993. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-54444-2 

  

Previous
Previous

AI in Medical Imaging: When the Machine Is Right and the Pathologist Is Not 

Next
Next

The Interoperability Gap in Digital Pathology